LAHORE: Former UN and World Bank Chief Technical Adviser Eng Bashir A Malik has expressed reservations about the recently-started Diamer Bhasha dam.
In an appeal to the chief justice of Pakistan, he said that Bhasha was not a natural site for a storage dam like Tarbela and Kalabagh. “It was identified as a site for hydropower development by the World Bank in 1967. However, its first feasibility report was drawn for a storage dam on cue by Wapda in 1984. The RCC Bhasha Dam’s height is 922 feet with a water storage capacity of 6.7 MAF and hydropower generation of 4,500 MW. There is no other dam of this height in the world,” he said.
“Diamer Basha appeared to be but a political or fake dam! Trickery did pay on 17 January 2006, when Musharraf suddenly announced building it first instead of the KBD. The safety aspects of the 922-foot high RCC Bhasha Dam stemmed from its unprecedented height and field risk factors. There is no RCC dam anywhere higher than 620 feet in China. RCC is relatively soft and vulnerable to cracks and leakage compared to conventional vibrated concrete used for building thousands of high feet dams, bridges and skyscrapers etc,” he added.
“The location of Bhasha Dam falls under an active earthquake zone and in the valley terrain prone to extraordinary environmental hazards. This region is seismically very active due to its position near the collisional boundary of the Indian and Asiatic tectonic plates. The proposed dam site is located in the Kohistan region.
“The Kohistan terrain represents an intra oceanic ‘Island Arc’, which was formed as a result of the collision process of the Indian and Eurasian plates. Grave seismic risk was demonstrated by a 7.6 magnitude earthquake of October 8, 2005,” he elaborated.
Incidentally, he said, it had also been predicted by a German consultant of a hydropower project that the Bhasha site falling in a seismically very sensitive zone, an earthquake of magnitude 7.5 could occur anytime. “He proved right as noted above. The earthquake devastated the region causing great loss of life and property, particularly in Azad Kashmir. Another serious risk factor may be reservoir induced seismicity primarily due to immense weight of water stored in a dam. It can trigger tremors. India’s Koyna Dam induced a 6.4 magnitude earthquake killing 180 people in 1967. A far more disastrous was the recent exceptionally 7.9 magnitude earthquake believed induced by water weighing 320 million tons stored behind 511- feet-high Zipingpu Dam built in 2004 on the Minjiang (Min) tributary of China’s Yangtze River. Reportedly, 80,000 people were killed. It must be noted that the weight of water would be far lower than the 922-feet-high Bhasha Dam — almost twice the height of Zipingpu. Risk could be greater due to its location in a very active seismic zone.”
He said, “Surprisingly, Bhasha project report did not address the risk of reservoir induced seismicity. The Indus Valley host to Bhasha Dam was known for massive avalanches, landslides, rock/snow dams and lake bursts. In the mid-19th Century, part of a mountain near Nanga Parbhat fell into the Indus triggered by an earthquake. It blocked flow for 6 months. In 2005, the government retained Diamer Basha Dam Consultants (DBDC) with a German company as the lead firm. This company was not qualified to be retained as it was blacklisted by the World Bank for having been found involved in cases of corruption and payoffs. This firm was also consultant for India’s controversial Baghlihar project. On November 24, 2006, the World Bank notified India of its decision that they were not qualified to be retained as consultant for any project.” http://thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=88132&Cat=2
Be First to Comment